vendredi 29 juin 2007

So here we are at the end of the mémoire

The bloody mémoire saga has come to an end.

Exactly a year ago, I was tentatively deciding on a subject with Prof. M. exactly a day ago I was presenting the fruits of my hard labour to a jury of two.
My mémoire subject: "French and British Parliamentarians in the 2004-2009 European Parliament: a comparative approach" has been my obsession and activity for the past five months or so, and my full time round the clock activity for the last two. It was given in on Tuesday 19th with considerable relief and fear that it is shit.

I didn't really prepare yesterday's oral soutenance, couldn't face reading the bloody mémoire again or researching the billion questions that they could catch me on. Turns out I didn't need to.
I went in, they were there. It was all very formal, in the classroom I have been working in for two years, the "European room", that boasts a couple of out- of -date EU maps and a couple of limp flags. I was formally dressed, M. was in usual jeans and green shirt, Mme B. (my constitutional law teacher and other member of the jury) was wearing bright red shoes, which is all I can remember about her.

What follows is twenty minutes of blur. First I talked (rather hesistantly and with wild arm gestures I think) about my subject, why it's interesting, why it's useful, how I researched it, what the problems are, what I found. They were nodding and grinning and mute. At one point I said 'Do you want me to go on?' (I don't know why), they said "no". Shit.

Instead Mme B. launched into her opinion of the bloody mémoire. "Incroyable! First time I've read a mémoire from beginning to end! Amazing analysis, very in depth, so clear, incredible standard, bla bla". As you probably know, people who wear bright red shoes can get enthusiastic, and she went crazy. "Apart from some typos and anglicisms it's great! Thesis quality! You must do a thesis". I was absolutely stunned. This is not false modesty: I wrote that mémoire in a single four-and-a-half-week block, disorganised, surrounded by photocopies, dirty plates and beer bottles, chain-smoking, living in a hovel and stressed beyond belief.
She raved on, mentioning one paragraph where I could have made a tiny distinction (University professors are fonctionnaires in France, but not civil servants in GB). Of all the crap and lack of precision present in that paper, she picked on that, which made me laugh out loud. She then ranted on more saying what a great researcher I was for a bit, my mind had disconnected from the shock.

M.'s turn. "Yeah I agree, you're great, it's great, you must do a thesis. Don't forget to add full stops at the end of your footnotes". What?? that's it? this is the most cantankerous teacher in the world (I rather like him actually), who always raves and comments and criticises. "I love your graphs, they're beautiful" he sighed, looking at the billion graphs that Microsoft Word had kindly turned out for me with a couple of clicks. Loves my graphs? They took 20 minutes. How about the gaping holes in research, the obvious lack of knowledge of the internal organisaton of the Parliament (one sad half page in the annexes), the leaps of logic?

Obviously neither had read it, only looked at the pictures.

They asked me to leave the room, which I did, trembling from shock and muttering thanks for the compliments. "Don't thank us", they snapped. Badly needed a cigarette but they told me to hang around. Within a couple of minutes they beckoned me back in and, all very formally told me stand up.

Mme B. said "Le jury ayant lu, le jury ayant vu, le jury a délibéré et vous donne la note de 18/20 avec ses félicitations unanimes". My jaw dropped. 18 is an incredible grade, unheard of I think. The best of the best, amongst whom I do not include myself, usually expect 16 or 17 after a brilliant mémoire and gruelling questions at the oral. I had given in an ok-ish paper and hardly spoken, and they were treating me as if I were a dictator's daughter in a banana republic. Are they really that desperate to get people to do a thesis?


jeudi 28 juin 2007

So here we are thinking about book VII : R.A.B

Hoooohooo!! The mysterious R.A.B who stole (and destroyed?) the locket horcrux that Harry and Dumbledore got is Regulus Black, Sirius's younger brother, ex death-eater from Slytherin and once taught by Slughorn, who was murdered a few days after leaving the Death Eaters. So what happened to the horcrux? Well, at the beginning of book V, when all are spring-cleaning Grimmauld Place, they come across loads of junk including a heavy locket that none could open. It is suggested in the book that they chuck it, and everything else, out. But it is quite plausible that Kreacher dragged it of somewhere. The question is whether a bit of Voldermort's soul is still in there.

So here we are thinking about book VII : Snape

For months now I have been obsessed by one single thought: finding enough time between the end of the bloody mémoire and the sale of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, last book in the J.K Rowling's epic, to record all my thoughts and speculations on the book. Is Snape evil? Is Dumbledore gone? Who is R.A.B ? These are some of the questions I think I may have the answers to, and would like to put in writing before the book comes out. I'm currently re-reading all books, so I will be adding stuff as I go along.

On Snape. Ok, so Snape was a death eater who did an unbreakable vow with Narcissa Malfoy. Ok, so Snape hates Harry. Ok, so Snape killed Dumbledore. I still think that Snape, despite everything is, if not good, at least not on Voldemort's side. The most obvious justification for this is that Dumbledore trusted Snape and, as Lupin says in one of the books, it all comes down whether you trust Dumbledore or not. Other than this strong but rather faith driven statement, careful readings of the books show that Snape's nature is more subtle than would seem at first glance.

Let's start with a hypothesis, that Snape is, has been for years, a spy for Dumbledore, and has for years been tricking the dark side in to believing that he was a spy of theirs, as he explains to Bellatrix at the beginning of book VI. We can speculate for the time being that Snape's allegiance to Dumbledore is down to an episode in his personal life, we can worry about that later. Snape's duty in this case, first and foremost, is loyalty to Dumbledore (if not the Order of the Phoenix), and this loyalty, we can suppose, involves protecting Harry and gathering information about Voldemort. In this scenario, we can imagine the worst possible outcome for Snape, when Narcissa suggests saying an Unbreakable Vow, would be to fluster and flounder and basically give the game away. In fact, I think that Snape, very smoothly, bluffs his way through the whole situation, pretending to know about Draco's mission (actually he uses Legimency to read what is in his mother's thoughts) and then, with amazing presence of mind, realises that he must agree to the Vow. His one solution is then to help Draco as much he can while warning Dumbledore, which is what he tries to do. Unfortunately, Malfoy's lack of trust in Snape means that this hypothesis is not tested, and we never find out whether Snape helps Draco to kill Dumbledore. Smart J.K.
But! I hear you cry. Snape Avada Kedavra'd Dumbledore on the tower, while Harry was petrified under the cloak. Indeed, but Snape is smart, and Snape saw two broomsticks (that Dumbledore & Harry had just flow in on), and Snape knew that if he didn't kill Dumbledore there & then, he would drop dead, and Dumbledore would die anyway at the hands of someone else. When Harry hears with horro that Dumbledore for the first time is pleading with Snape, he goes cold, but Dumbledore, and Snape, know Dumbledore has to die, and Dumbledore is pleading to Snape to continue and help Harry. One can argue that is what he does as he then runs off with Draco and other Death Eaters. By sacrificing Dumbledore, the spy is perfect.
Flashback to book IV, the graveyard scene when Voldemort is reborn. He counts those missing, six in all, three dead, one who is my most faithful servant (Bartie Crouch Jr), one too cowardly to return (Karkaroff), one who I believe has left me forever: Snape. The doubt is total, on both sides, and apparently only Dumbledore actually knows (knew) what side Snape was on and why. Something to do with Harry's mum? Something to do with Aunt Petunia (mystery shrouds Aunt Petunia with her letters from Dumbledore) ?


vendredi 22 juin 2007

So here we are at the fête de la musique

ha! what an evening! If I didn't know better I'd say I were completely fucked.

The fête de la musique was created in 1981 by then Culture Minister Jack Lang. The concept is pretty simple: every 21st of June, the streets of France belong to music - pro, amateur and in any style- allowing the French to soak up music the longest day of the year.

Over the years, there have been good ones and bad ones, though that is entirely down to the individual. The format of the fête has hardly changed since it's creation, though some people such as me believe that it is slightly less "free" than it used to be, i.e. slightly better organised, with bands for example in Paris now having to ask permission to play in their spot whereas it used to be that musicians would just pitch up wherever.

When we were younger, my mates and I would always go and see our friends who played in bands, usually one in particular at St Michel, in the heart of the Latin quarter. One memorable year I did the chorus on their take on the Red Hot Chili Peppers' Aeroplane. Most years, most of the night would be spent on the phone trying to get hold of people "T'es où?", "Attends, on arrive", and getting lost and failing to meet up. One has to bear in mind that in Paris at least there are about a million people (at least) roaming the streets, which is a lot of people and transfoms many areas, especially in the center, in to a real urban festival. As a consequence the best fêtes de la musique are either the ones where you improvise totally and wander calmly, or those where the organisation is perfect, and there is no impossible meeting up with people at various times.

Memorable years include: seeing Oasis live (after their only Parisian concert was cancelled) and free of course place de la République with my Marie and about a pint of vodka, the evening after the concert that included Aeroplane, where about fifteen old friends ambled around the north of Paris all night (and broke into the Montmartre gardens if I remember correctly), and others which have all blended together and I remember as long drunken musical walks with some of my best friends dancing to brass bands, metal concerts, old french chansons and whatever was waiting for us on our ramblings.

Last night was a good fête de la musique though it didn't look like it would be at first. The first rendez vous of the night was to see Furykane (see previous posts), who were taking part in a metal festival at about 5 pm. Fisrt cock-up of the night was when Marie called me and said she was just off. "Me too", I said, "shall we meet at St Michel?". "Eh?" she answered, "but it's at Nation". Okkkkkaaaayyy. This is what usually happens at three in the morning when everyone is drunk, not at teatime when the information actually comes from the guy who is playing. Calls to Axelle, who confirms St Michel. We set off, planning to meet up. Within minutes I got a phone call from Quentin: actually we're playing at Luxembourg and we start in 20 minutes. Here we go then....

Even by fête de la musique standards, where bands mushroom by the side of the road and take up pavements and bloc traffic, this was a stupid place to put up a stage. The huge truck full of equipment was blocking the bus lane and half the street, the stage was next to bus stop and blocking the pavement, and the rather small audience (all wearing black and looking sexily threatening) were the other side of the road. Busses had to crawl round the stage and people that spilled in to the street, the traffic was slowed for about a mile! Pedestrians had the choice between getting run over or basically walking across the stage, from which 500 hundred decibels of music were blaring

Luckily, there was a beer store so we were happy. Furykane played, ready for the Emergenza final on July 1st. They didn't get as much applause as other, heavier, bands, but i like their stuff, more subtle than the usual roar-and-grind-on guitar. There are five of them four guys and the singer; Quentin and Max, bassist and guitarist, are the ones I know best, having been friends with them for about ten years now.


After that about fifteen of us went to drink beer in the manucured Luxembourg gardens. The question, as always, is what now? The metal heads were off to another metal concert near Luxembourg. Marie, Axelle and I thought of the massive concert of out of town where our beloved Mika would be playing (all his concerts sell out too quickly for us ever to get to one). Gery called me and said a friend would be playing at the cutesy place Ste Marthe near my flat. Stéphane called me and asked me what was up. Marie, Axelle and I decided to leave the others, mett Stephane and try out this massive concert out of town. The only catch, besides the fact that there would be tens of thousands of people was that other than Mika, none of the other bands really tickled us: Avril Lavigne?? Christophe Maé?? Tokio Hotel?? The only solution was alcohol, lots of it.

Twenty minutes later we were in the métro at Odeon, each With a flask of 20 cl of vodka. Half an hour later, in a train full of teenage girls looking funky, we made it to Porte d'Auteil, where the huge hippodrome was converted to outdoor concert for the night. About five thousand people outside were queuing with an anarchy that can only ever be seen when the French are queuing. Everyone was being searched. Vodka flasks were concealed, Stephane went in search of beer, leaving us to queue for what we thought would be at least a couple of hours. Somewhere in the distance we could hear the concert had started. All of a sudden, the police (of which there were a lot), seemed to decide it was hopeless to search everyone, so we suddenly all went in. It was early dusk time, and the grass of the hippodrome glowed slightly, as if made radioactive by the far away sound of music and the buzz. We walked until we got to the end of the crowd, about 100 meters from the stage, near amps and a massive screen. We plomped down, Stéphane turned up out of nowhere and started drinking.

As night fell, and the alcohol sluiced through our veins, the pre-teen music became source of great amusement and Marie and I, forever bound together in the bonds of bad dancing ever since we did a terrible double act for our Baccalauréat, danced madly.


People moved off, or away, or back home as the night went on and we got wilder, and we had all the room in the world to dance, to hits from Faudel, Amel Bent, Shy'm, Avril Lavigne, David Guetta and others, and... yes Mika. We got only one song, Grace Kelly, the one will all know best, and it was the best boogie ever.

The night was light and drunken, and Marie and I danced like gorillas, under the disturbed stare of Stéphane, who is a bit of a dandy, and Axelle, who is a trained classical dancer. Soon after midnight it was time to move to the metro. We learnt a hundred thousand people had been there. And that they all wanted to take the métro at the same time as us. The stations were all shut from the overcrowding, so we walked west, away from Paris. We followed the huge wobbly crowd, peed in bushes (had been a while!), laughed stupidly. Eventually made it to a metro, all went back to the center together and somehow, all found the right lines home.

At Gare de l'Est, as hundreds of people poured out in to the night, a guy with a djembé asked if I wanted a coffee. I said I was going home, and it turned out he lives near me. We walked back by the side of the canal and then sat down for a chat. Turns out he is a non-smoking, non-drinking, very earnest, unemployed, er, djembé player who sometimes works with kids at the local maternelle. Weirdly his name is Mika. Turns out he also has been to Mali, but stayed in Bamako for a while (I meet a person a week who has been to Mali. Olivia and I thought we were rather cool to have gone. Still it turns out that nobody else had adventures like we did). We chatted for an hour I suppose and he has sent me a whole lot of blurb about this association he belongs to and helps... kids in Senegal. I'm going to put him in touch Ben and Action Culture. Chatted until three and went to have a look at a slam concert by the water, where a whole lot of hoodies gave us joints to smoke. He, being healthy, declined and ran for it. I, being me, accepted and stumbled back about three.

Aaaah, I love the fête de la musique.

lundi 18 juin 2007

So here we are getting married!

I went to England this weekend to see my favorite cousin Joe marry Lisa, a member of the family for 13 years now! I worshipped Joe when I was a kid, and loved Lisa ever since I first met her many Christmas's ago at our grandparent's house. This wedding has been planned for over two years now, longer than they have had little Alfie, who is two.
I love going to England and seeing my family, which is getting bigger every year! Ever since our beloved grandmother Judy died (on Xmas day 2003) it's been difficult to all meet up, but whenever we do it's just great. This was a real Britsh wedding: rain, loads of booze, everybody underdressed and a roasting hog... Fantastic!
Now for the introduction of my family.

<- Here are Joe and Lisa and Alfie, right after the vows, the first of many official piccies



The piccie below is of my uncle Stuart (Joe's dad and my mum's brother), my auntie Pat, Joe, Alfie, Lisa, my cousin Nick (Joe's brother), his girlfriend Em, and their baby Freya.















The big picture below is of Joe's (and therefore my) side of the family. I won't go into who everyone is, but that's me at the front in the blue skirt next to my cousin Chris. My mum is on the far right, next to her cousin Angela. I'm next to Heather, my cousin's aunt, and she's in front of my dad, who is next to Tony, Angela's husband! Confused yet? I might add that everyone on this piccie looks absolutely shit.


Here we are again, a bit later, starting left is my mum (Jane), Angela, Chris, Louise, Tony, Lorna and Ross.

On the other one, that's us all at our table (looking pinker you will notice!), clockwise from left, Chris, Mum, Tony, Ross, Uncle Stuart, Lorna, Louise, David and me.

















And here are two last pictures, one of the traditional hog roast, the other of me with the bride and groom.

vendredi 15 juin 2007

So here we are laughing at (with) the authors

We all have favorite books, most people even have a few. I have hundreds, though I cannot possibly read them all at any given time. Only when incredibly calm and relaxed can I read my all time wow-this-author-is-genius favorite "A Fine Balance" by Rohinton Mistry; only when on holiday can I read the exellent and fascinating "Fermat's last Theorem" by Simon Singh; only when single can I read "Wuthering Heights" by Emily Brontë. When I'm depressed I regress to childhood and devour Enid Blyton or Roald Dahl; when I'm bored I read food or history books. You get the picture, there is no such thing for me as a favorite book, and if I were stuck on a desert island I would have to take the complete Harry Potter series by JK Rowling, as they are the only books I've read that you can just read over and over and over and get better and funnier, with the possible exception of William Boyd's "A Good Man in Africa".

However, some bits of book I can read whenever, and usually do, twenty minutes before sleep or on a particularly long metro ride. These are usually funny epidodes of fiction or non-fiction, and include Lardass' achievements in Stephen King's short story "The Fall from Innocence" (from his book "Different seasons") or bits of William Boyd's "Stars and stripes".

Here are two such extracts that always make me laugh. The first is from the rather wonderful collection of stories "Mortification" edited by Robin Robertson. The book is a collection of author's worst moments, and I am shamelessly giving you Matthew Sweeney's, which is just as slapstick as you can get. The second is an extract from Ruth Reichl's "Comfort me with apples", an autobio-food book. I hope they make you laugh, as they never fail to with me.

Matthew Sweeney "If fortune turns against you" in Robin Robertson (ed), Mortification: writer's stories of their public shame, Harper Perennial, 2004, pp. 112- 115

"It's a dangerous thing to have too many esses in a poem. Or to have a tooth clean-up too close to a reading. Or to chew a toffee just before the reading starts - a toffee that turns out to suddenly have acquired a very hard nut, that is actually a crowned front tooth complete with mounting spike.
I was in Torhout, in Belgium, doing a few days' work in a high school. Before coming over I'd been involved in the judging of a school poetry competition, and part of the prize was an early dinner with me. Soùme prize, I thought, but I went willingly - I had some bits of advice to give the young people about their writing, and the food in Belgium tended to be good.
It was a girl and a boy who came to join me; the girl slim, diminutive, very confident, the boy, the first prize-winner, a bit on the shy side and fat. We chatted easily enough, they had pasta and coke, I had a rare chataeubriand, and red wine. When it came to dessert we decided to skip it, but a plate of free toffees came gratis, and I unwrapped one of these and stuck it in my mouth as we walked out.
So I was in the snow when I extracted my tooth from toffee and held it up. The cold wind whistled through the gap which the tip of my tongue instinctively went to fill. And I was on my way to the library where in five minutes I was expected to give a poetry reading.
Somewhere in the back of my mind I had a déjà vu about this happening once before, but long, long ago. All I remembered, though, was that it had been a toffee, too, that had done the damage on that occasion. I resolved there and then to give up toffees, but that wouldn't help me do the reading. As we picked our way carefully over the treacherous pavement, I chattered away, out of embarassement, to the two young people. I knew that if they weren't with me they would be laughing their heads off. All my words were coming out lisped. And all those esses in my poems!
Out of desperation, and prompted by the branch of the memory that stays in the unconscious, I put my tooth up into the gap and tries to push it back in. After a few attempts I actually managed this. It stayed in! So I might be able to do the reading after all. Full of resolve, and ambition to give the best reading of the year, I hurried us along to the library.
The teacher who'd organized my visit was waiting for me with the librarian who would introduce me. He was a quiet, likeable and clearly very decent man. The librarian was a jolly, quite attractive blonde. She immediately handed me a copy of the poster for the event which had a title at the top, I noticed - A Dramatic Whole. Puzzled, I looked at this until the teacher laughed and said he'd taken it from one of my e-mails, and I remembered telling him a poetry reading was a dramatic event, albeit drama with a little d. He'd turned it in to a big D. I smiled thinly and asked to see the reading space.
There were twenty or so chairs set up in what appeared to be the children's section of the library. As well as my reading, the presentation of the students' prizes would take place, and they would each read their winning poem. These had been nicey produced in a booklet. It was all very well organized. And the fact that the students would be there meant that their parents would be there also, so I would definitely have an audience.
I tried checking my email but the computer I'd been shown to refused to cooperate, so I flicked through some magazines instead, seeing how much of the Flemish I could understand from my rusty German. People were drifting in. I went over and looked through the prizes I would be handing out to the students. I sat down at the table at the front and looked through the reading list I'd carefully prepared. I wasn't giving my tooth a thought.
When all the prizewinners had shown up it was decided that we should get going. the teacher told the audience about the competition, nd how he'd coaxed me over to Torhout. I then gave a little spiel about poetry competitions, what I looked for, what I didn't want to see. The students came up one by one, received their prize from me, returned my smile, mumbled their poem, and sat down. Their parents took photographs.
Then it was my turn. As I half listened to the librarian introduce me, I was pumped up with adrenalin and raring to go. I got to my feet like a boxer coming out of is corner. I launched, without introduction, into the first poem. Two lines into the second, however, I felt the horrible sensation of my tooth loosening in my mouth. Sure enough, before I got the end of the poem it was in my hand again and I was lisping the last lines. Most of the adults in the audience were sniggering. I shoved the tooth back up into my mouth and started on the third poem, but this rendition was altogether less confident, and involved constant flicks of the tongue to ensure the tooth was staying in place. Not satisfied with this, I kept bringing my right thumb up to push the tooth in. I must have looked like Charlie Chaplin in The Great Dictator. Not surprisingly, there were frequent unscheduled pauses in the delivery of the poem. Even the teenagers were laughing now. The librarian had to take herself outside, overcome with hilarity.
I glanced at my watch, and at my reading list . God, I wasn't even halfway through yet. This was the worst reading I'd ever do in my life. I asked the audience if any of them were dentists, but all I got were grinning shakes of head. I started on another poem, noticing with horror that it was the most s-ridden of them all. Halfway through the piece the tooth came flying out of my mouth and bounced on the floor, rolling under the feetof the fat boy who was in the front rowThe momentum of the poem carried me on for a few lines toothless, lisping until embarrassment made me stop. The audience was in stitches now. One of them cried out, 'There it is! Don't put your foot down! It's under your shoe!'
'Give me my tooth back,' I croaked, and watched as two squeamish girls recoiled from it, leaving the fat boy to pick it up and bring it to me, shaking his head.
This time I couldn't fix it in at all. The teacher was on his feet now, telling the audience that because of my dental problems the reading had to be abandoned. As the audience filed out, looking back at me, I was still struggling to get the tooth in to my mouth."


Ruth Reichl, Comfort me with Apples, Arrow Books, 2003, pp. 281-295

(Ruth, an experienced and well known food writer/cook in her native California, is in Barcelona with five other American chefs)

It was April, and the air was crisp when we left the hotel, they city too delicious to resist. Rococo buildings were piled onto the sidewalk like pastries on a plate (...). 'Look!' said Alice, pointing to a little shop on the far side of the street. In the window stood a woman holding out a scoop filled with toasted almonds. She smiled and Alice pulled me across the street.
Inside the shop, saffron, cinnamon, and mint mingled with the aroma of nuts. The woman gestured, inviting us to come closer as she raked the almonds into a huge pile. Alice and I plunged our hands into the warm mound until they were covered all the way to the wrists. I closed my hand, retracted it, and put an almond in my mouth; the fragrance swelled to fill my entire head.
We munched on almonds as we walked, and then Alice discovered new treats: olives, anchovies, ice-cream. 'I'm really worried about this dinner', she confided. 'We're supposed to cook a meal for absolutely everybody who counts in the Barcelona food world, to show them how American cooking has matured. But these collaboration dinners are always difficult. Doing one in a foreign city, with people you haven't worked with, products you don't know, and no time to practice is insane. I can't believe any of us agreed to it!' (...)

'We're meeting for cocktails at ten.' It was Alice on the phone.
'Cocktails?' I asked. 'In the morning?'
'Hurry', she said. 'If you get up now you can just make it.'
Barcelona is rich in bars, and we bagan each day in a different one. "Why are we drinking sidecars at ten A.M.?' I asked one morning.
'To try and forget', said Johnathan, 'that we have this horrible dinner hanging over our head'. He was joking, of course, but when I thought about it afterward it seemed like a premonition. At the time I thought only that I too was trying to forget, and that alcohol was helpful.
Colman had arranged this trip with the firm determination of showing off everything Barcelona had to offer; our schedule was very full. We went to bakeries, wineries and markets. We were endlessly eating. My body ached from lack of sleep. (...)

The chefs wanted to see every site and sample every flavor. We spent hours in an olive store where the owner handed his wares across the counter. First the large obregons, which are cured in oranges; next the tiny black, purple, and green extremanas; and then, triumphantly, the little grayish arbequines, which are the pride of Catalonia. Colman took us to visit champanerias, vinegar makers and the House of Salt Cod.
'Write this down", said Lydia. 'I just ate salt cod with Roquefort sauce. If you had ever told me that I would do such a thing, I would have told you it was impossible.'
'Write this down too', said Mark. 'salt cod fried with honey. I can't believe I even tasted it.'
'And this', said Alice, 'it was good'.
'But not that good', said Johnathan. (...)

For years Barcelona had been forced to speak Spanish; now, freed from the tyranny of language, the city reveled in its own Catalan tongue. If you stopped someone to ask for directions to the Mercado de san José, he would look at you blankly, as if he had no idea what you could possibly be talking about. Ask for La Boqueria, on the other hand, and you got directions not only to the market but also the the nearby sidewalks designed by Miro.

An ornate Art Nouveau roof covers the market. It dates from the last century, but if you look around the edges you find ancient marble columns, the remains of earlier markets in much earlier times. la Boqueria is so rich in history that it feels like a great temple to food, and we all found ourselves becoming quiet as we entered its doors.

Inside, light filtered dimly down from the ceiling, and we blinked, adjusting our eyes. "Don't forget to make a list of what you find and where you find it", Alice called as we fanned out past neat pyramids of fruit, spiral stacks of mushrooms, and fluffy bouquets of herbs.
At the meat counters the tiny kids were strewn with flowers, which made them look like sacrifices rather than food. The animals were so young that the butchers' knives moved soundlessly through the soft bones. The innards were beautiful too: the tripe so clean and white it might have been spun by spiders, and the great dark blocks of congealed blood laid out like so much marble. Calves' brains, intricate coils, looked like some exotic fungus lying on the counter. "How beautiful they are!" said Llydia, staring at the looping twists. "I want to do something with those brains at the dinner."
Mark stood by the fish stalls, eyeing bright snapper, glistening blue mackerel, and silver sardines. "Raw fish", he murmured, "we should do something with raw fish. That would surprise them, since Catalans always cook their fish."

Across the aisle Alice was cooing over skinny, dark green asparagus. "We'll buy lots and lots of them to cook", she exclaimed. "They're wild!" She moved to the next stack, some fat white asparagus which she strokd tenderly. "I love their little lavender tips", she said, leaning over to break one off and stick it onto her mouth. The vendor looked on, startled.
Jonathan was mesmerized by clams with brightly patterned shells. "They're called Romeos", he sais, staring at them. "Aren't they wonderful? I want to use them for the dinner." The fish woman flirted with him, patting the shells so that all the clams seemed to stick out little red tongues. Jonathan laughed out loud and the fishmonger, delighted, did it again (...)

As they left the market, they were thinking big. "Colman's bragged about us all over Barcelona", said Alice. "Every winemaker and chef in the region is coming. The Julia Child of Spain will be there. How many courses do you think?"
Day by day the number grew. "Remember, we don't have a lot of time", said Alice... just before adding a quail course to the menu.
"Let's not go crazy", said Jonathan. And then tacked on clams casino as a second course.
"We want to make this as foolproof as possible", suggested Mark, increasing the courses with a pablano pesto. Still to come: the fish course, the meat course, the salad course, dessert.
The menu changed almost hourly as they discovered new foods. But as the days went on, one thing remained constant: Dessert, the chefs had agreed from the start, would be a blood-orange sorbet. "They'll be amazed", said Alice. "The only thing they ever do with blood oranges is use them for juice."
But on the day before the dinner Jonathan suddenly had a terrible thought: "What if there's no ice-cream maker?" he asked.
"Oh, there must be one," said Mark.
"If there's not," said Bradley, "I'll do it by hand." They all turned to stare at him. "With a rubber spatula," he explained, "and a stainless steel bowl set over rock salt and ice."

There was no ice-cream maker. There was barely a bowl. As the chefs hauled their purchases into the kitchen they looked at one another with dawning horror. Five people could not possibly work in that kitchen at the same time; five people could barely breathe in there at the same time. The dinner, clearly, was doomed.
"How are we going to cook six courses for forty people on two burners?" asked Alice, staring at the stove.
"We'll grill", said Jonathan.
"What are you going to grill on?" she asked.
"We'll build a grill,"said Mark. I'll use cobblestones if I have to."
"But it's starting to rain", said Alice.
"Don't worry," said Jonathan , "I can grill in any weather".
They had left behind kitchens stuffed with the latest equipment and staffed with eager assistants. At home they had minions who prepped the food, who cleaned and chopped and shredded. Not one of them had washed a pot in years. Now they were on the far side of the ocean staring at two burners, one small and slightly clogged sink, two pots, one pan, and not nearly enough room. They were staring at disaster. Amercia's most famous chefs took a deep collective breath, pulled on their whites, and went to work.

Bradley commandeered a corner of the kitchen. Knife flashing, he began boning quail; within minutes he was covered in blood. As he finished each bird, Jonathan swept the skeleton into one of the pots for stock; Lydia used the other pot to poach brains. Mark assessed the situation, realized that there was no room for him, and went outside to build a grill.
"I found the most beautiful baby spinach," said Alice, irritably inspecting her purchases, "but when we tried to buy it the woman took this ancient stuff from the back. We tried to get her to sell us the good stuff, but she said it was only for display." Alice gathered up the entire heap, dumped it in to he garbage, and turned to the remaining greens." The asparagus is bitter, " she lamented. "The beans aren't very good. there goes one course. We're not going to have enough."
"Alice, Alice", crooned Jonathan. He was now shaking garlic in a pan. The aroma rose up and filled the tiny kitchen. "It's okay."
"Where am I going to sauté the brains?" asked Lydia. In one smooth move Jonathan dumped the garlic out and handed the pan to Lydia.
"I'll put the garlic in the oven," he said. As she took the pan with one hand, the other was already reaching for the oil. They were beginning to move in the same cadence.
"Attention grillmasters", said Mark, standing in the doorway wih a puddle forming at his feet. "We've got a grill." He shook his soggy hair. "That's the good news. The bad news is, it's pouring."
Alics blanched. "There goes another course," she said.
"Don't worry", said Jonathan, briefly squeezing her shoulder. "I told you. I can grill in any weather."
"In this ?" she demanded, pointing at Mark, who had squeezed up to the counter, where he was dripping all over Bradley.
"Pray," he said.

Mark removed his knife from the case and changed the tempo in the room. He and Bradley stood shoulder to shoulder, their knives flashing to a different beat. Mark's was a staccato tattoo that transformed a solid hunk of tuna into a mountain of chopped flesh. He chopped chilies and cilantro and mixed them into the fish. As he squeezed limes over the mixture the aroma in the room changed, becoming piquant and almost tropical.
"Good thing we decided on tuna tartare", he said. "At least we have something that dosn't need cooking."
"But we've got to toast the bread to put it on, " said Alice, "and we've got to hurry; the guests are beginning to arrive". She puled the oven door and smoke came pouring into the room.
"We forgot the garlic she coughed, peering through the haz, which now enveloped everyone. "Can't anything go right?"
"Alice, Alice," said Jonathan, starting into the refrain, "it's fine."
He pulled out the garlic and began pawing through it as Alice knelt beneath him, toasting bread. She handed the bread to Mark, who had to reach around Jonathan while avoiding Lydia, who was still sautéing brains. The four of them were standing in smoke, occupying a space no larger than a shower stall, but the first course had gone out to the guests and they could hear the applause of the crowd. An air of palpable relief ran through the room. And then Lydia let out a groan.
"Oh no,"said Alice, standing up to fast and nearly upsetting the pan. "I can't believe we didn't buy enough."
"The great chef's of America!" said Jonathan. He began to laugh, and as they all joined in there was a moment of near hysteria. Then it was over. Lydia scattered capers into the hot oil; the burst into bloom, becoming crisp little flowers.
"Two courses down," said Alice, relief evident in her voiceas the brains went into the dining room. She picked up a bucket of shrimp and called, "Somebody peel these," as she sent it flying through the air. The confidence of the gesture stunned me, who did she think would catch it?
I was Lydia who held out her hand and grabbed the bucket. With one easy motion she dumped the shrimp out on the counter and began pulling of the heads. The chefs had all caught the rhythm now, moving in a kind of kitchen ballet that did not waste a single gesture. They had become a single ten-armed creature, thinking on its feet with a common goal: to get through the night. The olive oil held out; the rain stopped. The creature wroked silently piling vegetables, beans, peppers and clams onto the salad plates, dressing them, getting them out the door.
"It's colourful," said Jonathan. "It's unusual."
"And it's gone," said Alice, watching the last plate disappear into the dining room. Without a word Mark and Lydia went outside to grill quail. Inside, Jonathan reduced stock on one burner to make a sauce while Alice stood next to him, shaking artichokes and potatoes over the other.
"We could have used that spinach", said Alice unhapily inspecting the final arrangement. It's too brown."
The plates were not pretty, but that was a minor detail. The chefs were gritting it out, trying to get the food cooked and the evening to end . There was not quite enough quail to go round- every chef's worst nightmare- but they simply rearranged the plates and made it work. The ordeal was almost over.
Bradley was setting the pace now, his spatual hitting the side of a stainless steel bowl with a relentless thwack, thwack, thwack, a vibration reverberating through the kitchen. The beat was strong and so compelling that when he stopped, everything else did too.
In the sudden ringing silence Alice dipped a finger into the sorbet. We watched her face. "Nothing right tonight", she said.
Jonathan took a taste. "Terrible, "he agreed. And then in an instant they had pulled together , desperately trying to make the dish into something they could serve. They mascerated strawberries in Muscatel and tumbled them onto plates.
"We could make circles of blood oranges and put them around the edges," suggested Linda. She was already slicing as she spoke.

The guests applauded. they were polite. "It is so interesting," said the Julia Child of Spain, "to see our productsused in such different ways."
"That was terrible meal," sais Alice under her breath. She took a bow.
"It could have been worse", I whispered back, "under the circumstances."
"No," murmured Jonathan, "it was really bad. Accept it. That was no fun."
Lydia, the optimist, did not even lower her voice. "I had a good time," she said. "I lied working together. We fought for it." She looked around at the group and added. "We did our best. Sometimes that is ll you can do. And then you move on."



So here we are, la nouvelle star

well, julien, the timid psycho rock punk crooner (and much more) won. I personnally have a bigger crush on Tigane (though Julien is totally edible) so was mildly disappointed that he didn't win, but both are so talented and amazing that really either's album will probably be pretty damn good.

I thought I would compile their best songs of the season. None are original songs, but both manage to put their own mark on them, and the results are amazing. So here for the best of Tigane and Julien according to me....

Julien singing "Moi, lolita" (Alizée) , "You really got me now (The Kinks), "Hit me baby one more time"(Britney Spears), "Tainted love" (Soft cell), "Light my fire" (the Doors), "Les betises" (Sabine Paturel), "I put a spell on you" (Screamin Jay Hawkins)

Tigane singing "Billie Jean" (Michael Jackson), "Crazy" (Gnarls barkely), "Hey ya" (Outkast), "Celebration" (Kool and the gang), "Isn't she lovely" (Stevie Wonder), "Satisfaction" (The Rolling Stones), "Rock your body" (Justin Timberlake)

and the best duets that include them, "A la faveur de l'automne" (Tété) and 7 seconds (Youssou N'dour)

jeudi 14 juin 2007

So here we are nearly at the end

of the bloody mémoire which has now been plaguing my life for 6 weeks. I've written 120 pages of original material (sometimes a bit too original as it borders on fiction) that is more or less in French and is vaguely related to European politics, and that's pretty much all I care about!

Too tired to write anything but in need of a couple of laughs, so here is a random collection of funnies and beauties and weirdies.


















jeudi 7 juin 2007

So here we are saying : "Gilles you're old!"

This is not the announcements page of the Times, but hitting thirty is still a big deal! and yes, i am roughly two weeks late...

Happy 30th Gilles!!!!

dimanche 3 juin 2007

So here we are sending ecards


I love postcards, all kinds and have collected them for years and have always loved the funny ones. A few years ago when I was living in Brighton I came across some in a little shop that went in for all kinds of kitsch shit. Anyway, they had these postcards. On them were pictures that you assimilate with 1950s ads: impeccable women with strings of pearls and shoulder length wavy hair beaming next to washing machines or men with pipes clenched between their teeth and working hard; and next to them were more contemporary slogans. I still have two on my fridge, one, with a beaming woman, says "I'm having my period and can therefore legally kill you'', the other, with a square-jawed bloke raising a glass of whisky says "Rehab is for quitters!". My magnet on coffee is the one on the right.

Anyway I have found a splendid site right here with loads of these cards which are slightly more pop-arty and that you can send! Wonderfully cynical.

So here we are analysing chemicals

People sometimes say that they don' like the EU, that they don't identify with it, that they don't know what it is up to or what laws are being passed. The eurosceptics will say "bloody technocrats from Brussels imposing their legislation...", the europessimists will go "huh, EU isn't very efficient is it?", et europhiles willl mumble "well, things will get better".

Well this week things did get better, with the new EU legislation on chemicals, known as the REACH directive, coming in to effect. This directive that was approved by the European Parliament last December aims to increase the number of potentially harmful chemicals to be analysed, by asking chemical companies to prove that they are not dangerous. This is something of a breakthrough as until now it was up to public authorities to prove that the products were harmful. Up until now, out of the 100 000 chemicals available to the EU consumer or industrialist, only 3000 have been tested, and some links have been demonstarted between certain products (such as weed killer) and cancer or foetal malformations, to cite the most common ailments. As a result of this directive, 30 000 chemicals should be tested in the next decade, and many more after that.

This might sound long-term and rather vague, but by making the chemical producers responsible for testing the potential harm of some chemicals, the EU s not only hoping to save the health and lives of hundreds of thousands of people, but is also contributing to the emergence of corporate responsibility. From now, the public authorities will no longer have to spend millions on proving that things are harmful, now private money will go in to developing products that aren't in the first place.

Of course, one will have to watch out and make sure that the labs testing these chemicals are independent and not financed by the chemical companies, but hopefully the EU will be able to exercise some kind of control over this. For a more detailed account of REACH and what it will do, there is lots of stuff available here and here

vendredi 1 juin 2007

So here we are with the Kentucky creationists

I plopped down in front of the news last night for my daily dose of war, horror, crime, politics and cats-stuck-up-trees, when I saw something almost more frightening than all the above put together. You can read the full story here but, in a nutshell, a new museum has opened, a natural history science museum only - yup welcome to Kentucky - it is presenting national history as it is described in the Bible: the six days, six thousand years, God-created-it-as-it-is way of seeing the planet.

Now this is not an anti-Christian rant, nor is it a God-aren't the fucking Americans thick post(that comes later). No, I think that this creationist museum goes far beyond the themes of belief or national stupidity, and can be classified as dangerous.

So what is this museum like? Well, I saw some pictures on the news. There are , like in any natural history museum, several scenes (with plants, little rivers and rather awful automated mannequins) that depict the evolution, no damn, obviously not that, well the er, development of the World over the last 4 billion, no sorry, shit, 6000 years. It is rather ghastly. In one scene (depicting the Real Garden of Eden) Adam and Eve are splashing in a waterfall like in some ghastly shower gel ad. In another scene, a strange mechanical little boy in skins is sitting next to a dinosaur; in another the mammoths and the dinosaurs and the elephants and the rest are being piled on to the Ark. A film explains how God made the Grand Canyon and how, towards the bottom of the rift it is possible to see 'third day rocks', you know, the ones God made mid-week. The list goes on, as the people behind the museum fly literally translate every word of the Bible in to some hideous, plastic-and-plant little scene.

Now as a scientist (social scientist, but scientist nonetheless) I can quite see the point of having "alternative theories" to test our beliefs. Without these doubts, we'd still be living on a flat planet that is the center of the Universe (the fact that the Universe is infinite does make us the center of the universe, like every other point of it, but that debate's for another day). Science's methods dictate that we formulate a hypothesis, that we then test in order to reject or validate it. That is the way it is done, and so one can have little against those primary hypothesis, such as the one that states "God created the World and all things on it in six days, roughly 6000 years ago". However, once the hypotheis is rejected, usually in favour of one that, without necessarily being the truth certainly explains the evidence a lot better, then it is time to move on.

Coming back to our Kentucky creationists who, by the way, hope to get 250 000 people per annum through these museum doors, there is I believe something a lot more sinister about their "hypothesis" and one which in my view has a disastrous effect on humanity. I was struck by a chick on the news yesterday, a fat woman, married to a fat man with two fat kids who were waddling through the exhibits. The incredulous French journalist who was obviously wondering what the hell he had done to deserve being sent here was asking whether they actually believed any of this tosh (they were at this point next to the boy and pet dinosaur scene). Fatsy drawled "Yeah sure, evolution doesn't make sense, creationism makes sense". Fatso acquiesced.

Stop. You see this is where it bothers me. It makes sense? Hang on. Now I do not underestimate the power of the Bible in any country and certainly not in rural America, but to say that it makes more sense than what they can witness everyday out of their own bloody window is rather disturbing. because, you see, evolution does make sense, and not only does it make sense it is comething almost tangible if you look in the right places. What does "evolution" mean? It is defined as
1.any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.
2.a product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.
3.Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
4.a process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change or development, as in social or economic structure or institutions.


and lots of other things that have othing to do with our subject







Now, my point is that evolution is something that is visible and tangible. The stalagtites and stalagmites in caves are getting longer. The drops of water over the years have eroded away that tiny piece of rock. The ice caps are melting because it is getting hotter. Evolution is pretty obvious to anyone who sticks their head out of the window. The fact that the neighbour's pure-bred dog has a weak heart, due to the fact that over the years that fault in the genetic line has been reinforced so as to become symptomatic is evolution. The fact that insects no longer fear the chemical sprays that the good folk of rural America pour over their crops is evolution. Children are born with two heads and no arms because of dioxides in aforesaid chemicals is evolution. As for natural selection, the fact that the weakest of every litter usually dies, that only the best camouflaged insect in the forest survives to reproduce, that only those who can adapt to feed themselves in times of climate change (and don't you dare start saying there is no such thing) survive, all of these strenghts also reproduce amongst themselves


There are billions of examples, which over a long time span have never contradicted the theory of the evolution of the species that Darwin presented over two hundred years ago, and what I find partiularly disturbing is not the belief in a higher being (I myself believe in God and that s/he is the ultimate architect) or even a good healthy dose of scientific doubt. But what I do find disturbing is that people would rather believe a collection of scrolls (Yes ladies and gentleman, that's what the Bible is, remind me to tell you an anecdote at the end of this post) that go a long way back to the time when people believed a solar eclipse was the sign of the wrath of God, rather than the overwhelming evidence that we are the results of a long term, gradual tweaking of the gene pool. It's like saying that we give birth to babies and that therefore babies remain so forever, that we painted the wall white so therefore no mould can get through.

Now, that anecdote, from Bill Bryson's very easy and interesting book on the English langiuage, Mother Tongue, which is about a rather dim American congressman, who, quite seriously said "If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it's good enough for me". To all those who take the Bible literally, has it ever occured that you are believing translated scrolls from 6000 years ago over your own eyes?